nothing lives




nothing lives forgiveness, as nothing

she lives her tedious forgiveness

that is simple replication of a day


in the middle earth the sea changed
we put there, the sea that rips variation


open, the spacious grace gave thus this dubious

us a hope or a caring nightmare there so devils in heaven

fall back to sleep after the rude awakening orgasm

that tempted again them, temporality is splashed

in the face of them, a ”then” again or a ”now”


how now in the black ring of dusty light eternity was

tonight, red as the eyes of heaven

reclining on the times that lie here

supine, these climes most prone to inversion of

perverse god changed the rules, blessed


us at the behest of nothing, the question, at least

he said (nothing was nothing) wait

until you’re dead, my friend - eternity quivers us

lust lost, again.




love proffered




love proffered qua oblation

belated vocation now is night

of naughty unseasonable reason


it offered what It gives (Being) gives

it itself, the auto-affective self, shelved

selves (us) given thus lust like

two ill-fated portions of falafel on mourning’s


raped plate. the sauce that juices us savory

as lust comes nothing again sin, “is” is comatose

within a building Derrida designed as if he


had existed his jealousies behind the jalousie

blind as night where kittens have bitten the cords

twice that bind the blinds, they have bitten this


twinned time twice




as days refrained




as days refrained from judging once we left less supple loves there

where mourning marked us with her insufferable sufferance

ice-cream crept over the dreamless surfaces of night

of naught taut stretched over the sockets eyes in the numb skull tired like life. We tried to pretend that quantum indeterminacy might jump up and become something motivating us, as were the clinamen freedom, as if anyone ever worried about stuff even once


as days refrained from being before we were human

we believed in duty tried

to leave them


nothing really left to laugh at after Farrah Fawcett disproved Hegel's major ontological theses

by being number four of three making Derrida terribly

pleased, with every reason


and yet there are pigeons filling every waiting room at the train station when they want to, and i still do not know how many there are, exactly, or even if their number is odd or even, the world over. I know that the tiles there can rapidly turn dirty. Numbers do not exist in us but we know that there is no real infinity, we know that there are vast gaping modalities where dreams curl up to go to sleep. there is or is not necessity, depending on who you're reading. there is realitas but no reality, when we are gone there will be, but no truth that there are,

trees




resonance




as if this body resonated

to being, and the reasoning

brain vibrated to the violence,

to the gentle motion of the beings

around it, resonating with the dance

of atoms and particles, partial

to storing their limpid truth within

sinless cognition, words, or limp condoms

without dicks in them, memories

where orgasms were, again,


and yet it is this torture

at the hands of sadistic whores

like words, carving blind eyes

into the meat, impregnating

our incarnation with the slimy

seed of dreams; as if gobbling god were

greedy for meaning, semantics or semen,

his horrible cognition otherwise nothing,

and yet, there is no truth in us

or him, so fuck him, his holy

logos is us, this void and nothing




a train stopped at an empty station



history is a train stopped at an empty station

where there is no water. no body ever pretended

corpses are going anywhere, and souls are going

no further. philosophy teaches us more and more,

or would be much obliged if we said it did, analysis.

thus there is both progress and a growing corpus

of answers, the corpse of meaning, in fact – not

very sexy considering it is acknowledgedly a dead

body;


whatever deconstruction, which, as it grows old and ill,

gets compromised by religion, like lots of other cripples,

might think. (and whenever Derrida says “the proof of this

can be formalized” he means “by someone else,

who know how to formalize things; e.g.

not me.” who would actually stop to do that?

not he)


nevertheless, teleological explanations are only ever valid

in the biological sciences. these are not real sciences

either. they are full of shit, just like living animal

things


this is because of striving and departing orgasms -

none of them an appropriate theme

befitting a man


or the inanimate insensate grave

that just is, operationally defined

as “anywhere we stuff rubbish”

and thus it understands

exactly what befits a man.


in the only sense that ever mattered

“and” and “but” are exact synonyms -

just like “corpses” and “children”



David McLean is Welsh but has lived in Sweden since 1987. He lives there in a cottage on a hill with a woman, five selfish cats, and a stupid puppy. He has a BA in History from Oxford, and an unconnected MA in philosophy, much later, from Stockholm. Details of his three available full length poetry books, various chapbooks, and almost 850 poems in or forthcoming at 340 places online or in print over the last couple of years, are at his blog, AUTOEROTIC ELEGIES. He never submits by snail mail since he has little money and since he loves, or at least doesn't have anything against, trees. There's a new chapbook of dead snakes atRain over Bouville, another is coming from Poptritus Press in the summer sometime. A novella Henrietta forgets is forthcoming from Isms Press. Round the beginning of next year a large anthology of his poetry called laughing at funeralsEpic Rites Publications, as well as a 50 poem chapbook called Hellboundwhich is appearing sooner.

Read more work from David McLean.

|
││ ││ ││

All material is copyright © 2009 - 2010 Counterexample Poetics and individual artists. All rights reserved.